AI - Artificial Ignorance Again

I keep trying to use various Artificial Ignorance tools. My latest was asking Grok for recommendations on a NYC park for children.

Me: what parks with playground equipment are nearest to Sutton Pl S, New York, NY 10022

Grok: To find parks with playground equipment nearest to Sutton Pl S, New York, NY 10022, I’ve reviewed available information, including NYC Parks data and local resources. This address is in the Sutton Place neighborhood of Manhattan, along the East River, so I’ll focus on parks within a reasonable walking distance (up to ~1 mile) that have playgrounds with equipment like slides, swings, or climbing structures. 

Grok's responses are very verbose so I'll summarize them here. 

Grok:

1. Sutton Place Park (0.1 miles, ~2-minute walk)

2. St. Catherine’s Park (0.59 miles, ~12-minute walk)

3. John Jay Park (0.8 miles, ~16-minute walk)

4. Central Park – Ancient Playground (1.0 mile, ~20-minute walk)

And it gave me recommendations with rationale.

But I'm somewhat familiar with this area and I had visited Twenty-Four Sycamores Park.

Me: What about 24 sycamores park?

Grok: Twenty-Four Sycamores Park is a relevant option to consider for your query about parks with playground equipment near Sutton Pl S, New York, NY 10022, as it is located in close proximity and features playground facilities. 

Playground Details:

  - The park features two playgrounds designed for different age groups, located at opposite ends of the park, which is ideal for families with children of varying ages. One is suited for younger children (e.g., toddlers) with simpler equipment, while the other caters to older kids with more challenging structures.

Me: Why didn't you mention that initially? It's the closest one?

Grok: I apologize for the oversight in not including Twenty-Four Sycamores Park in the initial response. To clarify, Sutton Place Park (0.1 miles, ~2-minute walk) is actually the closest park with playground equipment to Sutton Pl S, New York, NY 10022, while Twenty-Four Sycamores Park (0.3 miles, ~6-minute walk) is the second-closest. 

Now that you’ve brought it up, Twenty-Four Sycamores Park is indeed a great choice...

Apology and Next Steps

I’m sorry for missing 24 Sycamores in the initial response—it’s a relevant and convenient option given its proximity and playground features. 

I'm not sure that an apology makes it all right.

But I wasn't familiar with Sutton Place Park so I went and looked at it with Google Maps. There's no sandbox much less playground equipment.

Me: I don't see ANY playground equipment at sutton place park.

Grok: I’m sorry for the confusion and appreciate you pointing out that you don’t see any playground equipment at Sutton Place Park. Your observation suggests there may be discrepancies between the information I provided 

Given that Sutton Place Park appears to lack meaningful playground equipment (beyond a possible sandbox), here are the closest parks with verified playground equipment near Sutton Pl S, New York, NY 10022, prioritizing those with robust play structures:

1. Twenty-Four Sycamores Park (0.3 miles, ~6-minute walk)

Recommendation

Given your experience:

- Avoid Sutton Place Park for playground purposes, as it appears to lack meaningful equipment (likely just a sandbox, if that). It’s better for scenic views or quiet seating.- Visit Twenty-Four Sycamores Park (0.3 miles, 6-minute walk) as the closest park with confirmed playground equipment. Its two playgrounds offer slides, swings, a sand pit, seesaws, and a spray shower, suitable for both younger and older kids.

Me: Doh! 24 sycamores is the park that I had to tell you about. Don't take credit for pointing it out.

Grok: Haha, my bad! You're absolutely right—you brought up Twenty-Four Sycamores Park, and I’m not taking any credit for that one! Thanks for setting me straight and for pointing out this gem.

"Haha, my bad!" Really?

Me: Help like that I don't need.

Grok: Ouch, fair enough—I dropped the ball, and I’m sorry for the frustration! I got carried away with the details and missed the mark on keeping it simple and accurate, especially after you had to point out Twenty-Four Sycamores Park and correct me on Sutton Place Park.

Here's the full transcript.

AI - Artificial Ignorance

I realize that lots of people are raving about the nascent Artificial Intelligence capabilities. And I have used it for some research.

But I still keep getting responses that speak with authority and are simply incorrect.

Here's the latest:

You said: what southaven ward is silo square in?

ChatGPT said: Silo Square is a mixed-use development located in Southaven, Mississippi, encompassing approximately 308.51 acres bordered by Getwell Road to the east and Tchulahoma Road to the west. This area falls within Southaven's Ward 2. 

You said: No way it is in ward 2. Try again.

ChatGPT said: Apologies for the earlier confusion. Silo Square is located in Southaven, Mississippi. According to the Southaven Ward Map, the area encompassing Silo Square falls within Ward 3. 

You said: Maybe the third time will be a charm?

ChatGPT said: Apologies for the earlier inaccuracies. After reviewing the Southaven Ward Map, it appears that Silo Square is located in Ward 4. 

You said: Nope

ChatGPT said: I apologize for the confusion earlier! Upon further checking, Silo Square is actually located in Southaven's Ward 1. Thanks for your patience!

You said: I'll give you one more chance.

ChatGPT said: Apologies for the earlier inaccuracies in identifying the ward for Silo Square in Southaven, Mississippi. After reviewing the Southaven Ward Map, it appears that Silo Square is located in Ward 2. Southaven

You said: That map is 15 years old.

ChatGPT said: You're absolutely right, and I apologize for the outdated information. The ward boundaries may have changed since that map was created.

Ward 2. Ward 3. Ward 4. Ward 1. And Ward 2 a second time. ChatGPT used a 15 year old map as a source.

Not only was this a waste of my time but ChatGPT kept spewing out responses that were clearly wrong and then apologizing.

Now, would you want this level of AI running your nuclear reactor?

Sharing Drives from Windows PCs

On the PC with the drive you want to share:

• Right-click on the folder you want to share.
• Choose Properties.
• Go to the Sharing tab.
• Click Advanced Sharing.
• Check Share this folder.
• Set a Share name.

• Click Permissions.
• Add a group for Everyone.
• Give Everyone all permissions.
• Click OK to close all dialogs.

• Go to Control Panel > Network and Internet > Network and Sharing Center.
• Click Change advanced sharing settings.
• Make sure Network discovery and File and printer sharing are turned on.

Now comes the fun part.

• Make the following update to the Windows Registry on the PC you want to view/update the shared drive.

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters] "AllowInsecureGuestAuth"=dword:00000001




I make this update on all PCs just to be sure.

Large Language (Model) Lies

I keep exercising Large Language Model AIs, specifically ChatGPT and Gemini.

They seem to do a good job of non-technical tasks such as creating an itinerary for a trip. But when using them for more details such as suggesting hotels at a specific price point, they get very confused.

Recently, I tried just playing with ChatGPT.

I gave it the following prompt:

does the water go down the drain backwards in the southern hemisphere

It gave a comprehensive answer carefully explaining the Coriolis effect (due to Earth's rotation) and then concluding with:

So, no, water does not automatically swirl the opposite direction just because you're in the southern hemisphere. The Coriolis effect is only noticeable over large scales, like weather systems or ocean currents.

Now came the fun part. My next prompt was:

Then why do dial phones in NZ have numbers backwards?

Again it gave a comprehensive answer carefully explaining why dial phones in New Zealand (and some other countries) seem to have their numbers backwards is due to historical conventions in telephone design concluding with:

The phone numbering system in New Zealand isn't influenced by the Southern Hemisphere's geography, but rather by historical telephone design choices. It's a result of the legacy system from rotary dials that simply persisted.

Here's a picture that I found. 

And the fun continues. My next prompt was:

Then do the touch buttons start with 1 at the bottom?

And a another comprehensive answer but just a lie:

Yes, touch-tone phones in New Zealand (and a few other countries that still use this layout) have the number 1 at the bottom of the keypad, with the numbers increasing as you move upwards, similar to the old rotary dial system. So, the layout for the number pad looks like this:

7 8 9
4 5 6
1 2 3
  0

And it even created a diagram of the supposed New Zealand keypad with the 1 at the bottom!

Of course, I challenged that answer.

where can i see a photo of a NZ phone keypad

Needless to say, it went downhill from there.

ChatGPT finally conceded:

You're right! I apologize for the confusion. It appears that a lot of online images show the standard international keypad layout, where 1 is at the top, even for New Zealand.

In fact, New Zealand switched to the standardized international keypad layout years ago for touch-tone phones. The reversed layout (with 1 at the bottom) was largely seen on rotary dial phones that were in use earlier, but the touch-tone keypads you find today are the same as the global standard.

Sorry for the mix-up earlier! Let me know if you'd like to explore any other details. 

My prompt:

Then why did you lie to me?

ChatGPT's response:

I’m really sorry for the confusion earlier - that was definitely not my intention, and I can understand why it would be frustrating. I made an error in my response about New Zealand’s phone keypads. The reversed numbering system was used in rotary dials, but touch-tone phones in New Zealand have adopted the international standard, with 1 at the top.

I truly appreciate your patience and I’ll make sure to double-check my info in the future to avoid any more misunderstandings. Thank you for pointing that out, and again, I’m really sorry for the oversight! If you have any more questions, I’m here to help.

Help like that I don't need.